Instant Alert: Trump's Supreme Court pick once criticized lawmakers for 'grossly mistreating' judicial nominees

Posted On // Leave a Comment

Your Message Subject or Title

  MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS   |   UNSUBSCRIBE   |   VIEW ONLINE
 
 
 
 
 

Trump's Supreme Court pick once criticized lawmakers for 'grossly mistreating' judicial nominees

by Bryan Logan on Feb 1, 2017, 12:49 AM

Advertisement

Neil Gorsuch, the federal judge President Donald Trump nominated to the US Supreme Court on Tuesday, once criticized lawmakers for "grossly mistreating" judicial nominees.

Gorsuch wrote an article in 2002 reflecting on Justice Byron White, a John F. Kennedy appointee who died in April that year after serving for 31 years on the Supreme Court bench.

Gorsuch's article praised White and slammed lawmakers for delaying the confirmations of Merrick Garland and John Roberts, who were both appointed to the US Court of Appeals in Washington — Garland in 1995 and Roberts in 2001.

"Both are widely considered to be among the finest lawyers of their generation," Gorsuch wrote, "Garland was left waiting for 18 months before being confirmed ... Roberts, nominated almost a year ago, still waits for a hearing," the 2002 article read.

Notably, Gorsuch now faces his own confirmation process as Trump's Supreme Court pick, less than a year after former President Barack Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland for the vacant post.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell vowed not to hold any hearings on Garland, putting Garland in the same limbo for which Gorsuch criticized lawmakers 15 years ago.

In a statement following Gorsuch's nomination Tuesday, McConnell, who led the blockade against Garland, praised Trump's decision and called for Gorsuch to receive "fair consideration."

SEE ALSO: TRUMP SUPREME COURT PICK: It's Neil Gorsuch

DON'T MISS: The fight over Trump's Supreme Court pick might go 'nuclear'


 
Share the latest business news with your network:

Facebook Share Twitter Share Email Share
  

Email sent to:   |   Manage your email preferences   |   Unsubscribe

Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy

Business Insider. 150 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011
Sailthru

Instant Alert: 'It is an extraordinary resume': Watch Trump explain why he is nominating Neil Grorsuch to the Supreme Court

Posted On // Leave a Comment

Your Message Subject or Title

  MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS   |   UNSUBSCRIBE   |   VIEW ONLINE
 
 
 
 
 

'It is an extraordinary resume': Watch Trump explain why he is nominating Neil Grorsuch to the Supreme Court

by Arielle Berger on Jan 31, 2017, 10:09 PM

President Donald Trump selected 10th Circuit Judge Neil Gorsuch Tuesday evening as his nominee to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant for nearly a full year by Justice Antonin Scalia following his death last February.

Follow BI Video: On Twitter


 
Share the latest business news with your network:

Facebook Share Twitter Share Email Share
  

Email sent to:   |   Manage your email preferences   |   Unsubscribe

Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy

Business Insider. 150 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011
Sailthru

Instant Alert: Chuck Schumer blasts Trump's Supreme Court pick, setting up lengthy Senate battle

Posted On // Leave a Comment

Your Message Subject or Title

  MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS   |   UNSUBSCRIBE   |   VIEW ONLINE
 
 
 
 
 

Chuck Schumer blasts Trump's Supreme Court pick, setting up lengthy Senate battle

by Mark Abadi on Jan 31, 2017, 9:18 PM

Advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Tuesday said he had concerns over President Donald Trump's nomination of Neil Gorsuch for the Supreme Court on Tuesday, setting up what is likely to be a long and contentious confirmation process for the judge.

"The burden is on Judge Neil Gorsuch to prove himself to be within the legal mainstream," Schumer said in a statement issued moments after Trump revealed his pick.

"Make no mistake, Senate Democrats will not simply allow but require an exhaustive, robust, and comprehensive debate on Judge Gorsuch’s fitness to be a Supreme Court Justice."

It was a predicable take for Schumer, who has vowed since Trump's election in November that he will fight any nominee outside of what he considers the mainstream.

He was joined by several other Democrats incensed over their Republican counterparts' refusal to hold a hearing for Judge Merrick Garland, the Supreme Court nominee Barack Obama proposed to fill the seat of the late Antonin Scalia.

Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon told Politico on Monday he would filibuster any Trump pick that was not Garland. If Democrats do employ the filibuster, Republicans would need a 60-vote supermajority to confirm Gorsuch. Republicans hold 52 seats in the Senate. On Tuesday, Merkley accused Republicans of "packing" the high court.

"This strategy of packing the court, if successful, could threaten fundamental rights in America, including workers’ right to organize, women’s reproductive rights, and the rights of ordinary citizens to have their voices heard in elections rather than being drowned out by the corrupting influence of dark money from the richest Americans," Merkley said.

Republicans, in turn, could apply the "nuclear" option — changing the Senate's rules to disallow the filibuster. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has expressed reticence to go that route in media appearances this month.

"When the Senate previously confirmed him to the appellate court, the bipartisan support in the Senate was so overwhelming, a roll call vote was not even required," he said Tuesday. "I hope members of the Senate will again show him fair consideration and respect the result of the recent election with an up-or-down vote on his nomination, just like the Senate treated the four first-term nominees of Presidents Clinton and Obama."

Schumer foreshadowed a Democratic filibuster in his statement on Tuesday.

"The Senate must insist upon 60-votes for any Supreme Court nominee, a bar that was met by each of President Obama’s nominees," he said.

Schumer wasn't the only Democratic senator to blast Trump's nominee on Tuesday — Sens. Chris Murphy, Sherrod Brown, Richard Blumenthal, and more all issued similarly worded statements criticizing Gorsuch following Trump's announcement. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi also signaled opposition, saying Gorsuch was "hostile to women's rights."

Read Schumer's full statement below:

A little more than a week into the Trump presidency, the new Administration has violated our core values, challenged the separation of powers, and tested the very fabric of our Constitution in unprecedented fashion. It is clear that the Supreme Court will be tried in ways that few Courts have been tested since the earliest days of the Republic, when Constitutional questions abounded.

Now more than ever, we need a Supreme Court Justice who is independent, eschews ideology, who will preserve our democracy, protect fundamental rights, and will stand up to a President who has already shown a willingness to bend the Constitution.

The Senate must insist upon 60-votes for any Supreme Court nominee, a bar that was met by each of President Obama’s nominees. The burden is on Judge Neil Gorsuch to prove himself to be within the legal mainstream and, in this new era, willing to vigorously defend the Constitution from abuses of the Executive branch and protect the constitutionally enshrined rights of all Americans.

Given his record, I have very serious doubts about Judge Gorsuch’s ability to meet this standard. Judge Gorsuch has repeatedly sided with corporations over working people, demonstrated a hostility toward women’s rights, and most troubling, hewed to an ideological approach to jurisprudence that makes me skeptical that he can be a strong, independent Justice on the Court.

Make no mistake, Senate Democrats will not simply allow but require an exhaustive, robust, and comprehensive debate on Judge Gorsuch’s fitness to be a Supreme Court Justice.

SEE ALSO: TRUMP SUPREME COURT PICK: It's Neil Gorsuch


 
Share the latest business news with your network:

Facebook Share Twitter Share Email Share
  

Email sent to:   |   Manage your email preferences   |   Unsubscribe

Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy

Business Insider. 150 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011
Sailthru

Instant Alert: Jake Tapper scorches White House with 2-minute fact-check on Trump's immigration order

Posted On // Leave a Comment

Your Message Subject or Title

  MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS   |   UNSUBSCRIBE   |   VIEW ONLINE
 
 
 
 
 

Jake Tapper scorches White House with 2-minute fact-check on Trump's immigration order

by Mark Abadi on Jan 31, 2017, 8:49 PM

Advertisement

CNN anchor Jake Tapper called out White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer on Tuesday, issuing a scathing critique of Spicer's attempts to downplay President Donald Trump's executive order on immigrants and refugees.

Earlier on Tuesday, Spicer had insisted to the White House press corps that Trump's executive order, signed on Friday, was not a "ban" on Muslims, but an "extreme-vetting" system. When a reporter pointed out that Trump himself had used the word "ban" to describe his order, Spicer claimed the president was simply "using the words that the media is using."

Tapper took issue with Spicer's attempt at linguistic gymnastics.

"It seems odd, though. If you object to the term, you shouldn't use it, right?" the anchor said on CNN's "The Lead," on Tuesday, cutting to an interview from last week in which Spicer used the term "ban" as well.

"To be fair, that was Sean Spicer on Sunday. Surely he has not used the term 'ban' since then," Tapper said, before cutting to a clip of Spicer referring to Trump's order as a "ban" at a George Washington University event on Monday.

"OK, everybody clear now?" an increasingly baffled Tapper asked. "Nobody should follow the lead of the biased media and call the executive action a ban. Instead, follow the lead of the White House, and call it a ban."

Watch the takedown here:

Tapper's comments come as CNN wrestles with its diminishing access to Trump's White House. The administration has stopped sending Trump surrogates to appear on the network, in what one source from the network believes is an attempt to punish CNN for allegedly biased reporting, according to Politico.

Tapper in particular has stood out as a presidential watchdog. A week ago, he forcefully condemned Trump's false claim that millions of illegal ballots had been cast for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton — a claim for which Trump has provided no evidence.

The executive order Trump signed on Friday bars people from seven majority-Muslim countries from entering the US for 90 days, as well as barring all refugees for 120 days, and Syrian refugees indefinitely.

SEE ALSO: Jake Tapper issued the strongest takedown yet of Trump's baseless voter-fraud claims


 
Share the latest business news with your network:

Facebook Share Twitter Share Email Share
  

Email sent to:   |   Manage your email preferences   |   Unsubscribe

Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy

Business Insider. 150 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011
Sailthru

Instant Alert: TRUMP SUPREME COURT PICK: It's Neil Gorsuch

Posted On // Leave a Comment

Your Message Subject or Title

  MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS   |   UNSUBSCRIBE   |   VIEW ONLINE
 
 
 
 
 

TRUMP SUPREME COURT PICK: It's Neil Gorsuch

by Allan Smith on Jan 31, 2017, 8:05 PM

Advertisement

President Donald Trump selected 10th Circuit Judge Neil Gorsuch Tuesday evening as his nominee to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant for nearly a full year by Justice Antonin Scalia following his death last February.

More to come...

SEE ALSO: The fight over Trump's Supreme Court pick might go 'nuclear'


 
Share the latest business news with your network:

Facebook Share Twitter Share Email Share
  

Email sent to:   |   Manage your email preferences   |   Unsubscribe

Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy

Business Insider. 150 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011
Sailthru

Instant Alert: The 'I'm a Mac' guy from the Apple commercials is now promoting an Android phone

Posted On // Leave a Comment

Your Message Subject or Title

  MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS   |   UNSUBSCRIBE   |   VIEW ONLINE
 
 
 
 
 

The 'I'm a Mac' guy from the Apple commercials is now promoting an Android phone

by Matt Weinberger on Jan 31, 2017, 8:00 PM

Justin Long, the actor probably best known for his role as the "I'm a Mac" guy from Apple's classic TV commercials, is now appearing in a commercial promoting the Huawei Mate 9 Android phone.

Watch the commercial, which makes some sly nods at Long's past with Apple, here:

"I have a ton of experience in tech," Long says in the 60-second commercial.  As Campaign US reports, it was indeed Long's association with Apple that made him a shoe-in for the gig. Now, instead of promoting Apple tech, he's pitching a phone running its biggest rival in the smartphone world.

Long starred in 66 "Get a Mac" commercials from 2006 to 2009, alongside actor and comedian John Hodgman. Long played the younger, cooler Mac, and Hodgman was the older, stodgier PC. The campaign played a big role in the resurgence of the Mac in 2006, and kept going even after the iPhone was launched in 2007.

Here are all 66 commercials, back to back, in case you have 39 minutes or so to kill:

Long is the second tech spokesperson to change sides in recent memory: In June 2016, Paul Marcarelli — the Verizon "can you hear me now?" guy — jumped ship to Sprint.

SEE ALSO: Apple's iPad business is experiencing major shrinkage


 
Share the latest business news with your network:

Facebook Share Twitter Share Email Share
  

Email sent to:   |   Manage your email preferences   |   Unsubscribe

Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy

Business Insider. 150 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011
Sailthru

Instant Alert: Why Apple CEO Tim Cook won't stand for shady sofa salesmen

Posted On // Leave a Comment

Your Message Subject or Title

  MANAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS   |   UNSUBSCRIBE   |   VIEW ONLINE
 
 
 
 
 

Why Apple CEO Tim Cook won't stand for shady sofa salesmen

by Alexei Oreskovic on Jan 31, 2017, 6:59 PM

Advertisement

Apple CEO Tim Cook believes Qualcomm has been acting like a shady furniture dealer. 

Cook took a shot at Qualcomm, one of the main chip suppliers for the iPhone, during its quarterly earnings call on Tuesday when an analyst asked about the legal fight the two companies are embroiled in.

Apple sued the chipmaker earlier this month, accusing it of withholding $1 billion in rebates it owed Apple, and alleging that Qualcomm charges Apple "at least five times more in" royalty payments than all of Apple's other patent licensors combined.

"We didn't see another way forward. They were insisting on charging royalties for technologies that they had nothing to do with," Cook said on Tuesday, repeating many of the talking points that Apple trotted out when it first sued Qualcomm. 

But then, in a seemingly extemporaneous rhetorical flourish, Cook came up with a domestic analogy to drive home the point:

"It's somewhat like buying a sofa and you charge somebody a different price depending upon the house that it goes into," he said. 

The idea, Cook suggests, is that Qualcomm is charging a higher licensing fee for the wireless chips that go into iPhones than it does when the chips are featured in other products.

A sofa vendor that sells the same couch at different rates would surely raise eyebrows.

But to some observers, a better analogy that Cook might have made was not home furniture vendors but pharmaceutical companies:

 

SEE ALSO: Apple beats on revenue and profit but forecasts weakness ahead


 
Share the latest business news with your network:

Facebook Share Twitter Share Email Share
  

Email sent to:   |   Manage your email preferences   |   Unsubscribe

Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy

Business Insider. 150 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011
Sailthru